Plate angle and spacing: | Typical plate inclinations in industry range between 45° and 70° (some sources mention ~50-60°) to allow settled solids to slide down and to maximise self-cleaning. |
Projected settling area: | Because the plates increase area, a lamella clarifier can require significantly less footprint (some literature indicates up to 10 m² of settling area per 1 m² of floor). |
Upward flow velocity (rise rate): | Low fluid upward velocity is critical so suspended particles have time to settle; typical rise rates for lamella units may be in the range of ~0.8-4.9 m/h (varies by source) or surface loading ~10-25 m/h or higher relative to conventional clarifiers. |
Feed distribution and turbulence control: | Even flow and minimal turbulence are essential because uneven or high velocities disturb settled solids and reduce efficiency. |
Sludge collection and discharge: | The hopper/sludge collection area must be sized for settled solids, with low disturbance and periodic discharge. |
Material of construction & fouling: | Plates may be steel, FRP, etc; spacing and maintenance access for cleaning may be critical in corrosive or abrasive service. |
Feed solids concentration and characteristics: | The design must consider feed particle size distribution, density, flocculation response (especially for fine particles) and chemistry. |
Integration with upstream/downstream: | Often lamella units are used after flocculation or as pre‐treatment; selection must consider effluent clarity target and footprint constraints. |
Plate inclination angle: | ~45° to 70° | Self-cleaning and sliding of solids |
Plate spacing: | ~50 mm (sometimes 50-80 mm) | For typical industrial loading |
Surface loading / overflow rate: | ~10-25 m³/m²·h (or 5-12 m³/m²·h in some sources) | Compared to conventional clarifiers; depends on feed. |
Rise (upward) velocity: | ~0.8 – ~5 m/h | Lower values preferred for fine particles. |
Effective settling area gain: | Up to ~5–10× | compared to same footprint conventional clarifier |
Footprint / footprint reduction: | Up to ~65-90% reduction vs conventional tanks | Space saving advantage |